President releases Global Warming Speech Early

The President has released, exclusively to the micronational community, his scheduled speech on global warming activism. The speech can be found below, in it’s original form.

We knew the 2035 claim was gray literature”–Dr. Murari Lal

Dr Pachuri has also been accused of using the error to win grants worth hundreds of thousands of pounds.”–The Times (UK)

The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a well respected body of climate change experts who evaluate the risk of human caused climate change. They are sanctioned by the UN and won the Nobel prize in 2007 for their work.

The IPCC used research from UN scientist Dr. Murari Lal at a Climate conference in Copenhagen, knowing it had not been reviewed. The research stated that the Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035. The Indian Government spoke up citing their own, more recent, research as an independent review of Dr. Lal’s report, they was dismissed by the chairman of the IPCC, Raj Pachauri, as conducting “voodoo science.” The IPCC, after being told by Dr. Lal that the science had not been peer reviewed, announced that they would “consider” using other research in their final report. They only used Dr. Lal’s.

IPCC Chair, Dr. Pachauri is very controversial. He has been accused of using his power as leader of the IPCC to help his global warming research group TERI. Recently he was accused of using the false glacier claims to gain grant money, worth hundreds of thousands of British pounds. This story of this broke out in January 2010, somehow it has been kept relatively under wraps here in the US, while in the UK it was covered by prestigious newspapers such as the Times and the Daily Mail.

This is the whole reason Global Warming, now called Climate Change, was popularized. Money. The money involved with supporting global warming is immense. Scientists are not alone in capitalizing on this opportunity.

Hybrid makers, car companies like Toyota, Ford, Nissan and others are capitalizing on “climate change.” These companies, and others, push the idea that the world is in peril, and that the best way to solve the problem is, of course, to buy one of their “eco-friendly” vehicles. (Present graph here). The sales of hybrids are higher than ever, and so is the demand. All because of the “climate change.” For these Hybrid makers, already experiencing sales jumps, President Obama is funding 2.4 billion dollars of taxpayer money to help companies produce next generation hybrid batteries, hybrid car structure, and better electric engines. The money will be administered by the Department of Energy.

Developing countries also capitalize. Namibia is a developing country capitalizing on global warming. Namibia has demanded 755.9 million US Dollars in damages from UN countries. That is a lot of money. Namibia did not specify who the money would come from in the climate conference, just that they required it. They are claiming damages such as a 1.2 degree temperature rise in the last century, and possible extinction of the indigenous “Quiver Tree.” This is ridiculous. Namibia claims that developed countries must pay them money for something that hasn’t been proved. This is like demanding a fine from a criminal who hasn’t been convicted.

Even in the US, government officials are demanding money for climate change. Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of California are demanding that a tax on carbon be put into place. According to, a carbon tax would “levie a fee on the production, distribution or use of fossil fuels based on how much carbon their combustion emits. The government sets a price per ton on carbon, then translates it into a tax on electricity, natural gas or oil.” Such a tax would only hurt the nation. A tax that has not already been implemented takes money from the people and gives it to the government. No one should support this even if it’s intentions are good.

The money involved in global warming is colossal and people of different backgrounds, scientists, car manufacturers, developing nations, and national governments are cashing in on the hoax. They have already convinced most of the world’s population and they will continue to drive the idea into our heads.

  1. Fair enough, I admit that as with most things on an international scale people stand to make a lot of money out of the changes that must be implemented to successfully challenge climate change. But that doesn’t mean it’s a hoax – you have provided no scientific evidence to dismiss it as such, only circumstantial evidence that various groups of people can capitalise on the situation and benefit financially. Of course they therefore have a personal incentive to push for further measures against climate change, but that can by no means prove that it is a “hoax”.

    • This isn’t my only speech, I assure you! This one simply deals with one aspect of it, it isn’t a scientific one, rather an economic-political one, showing how people use things like this in ways that it should not be. It is part of my series of unpublished papers and speeches on this. I am scheduled to speak in front of a small audience (10-20 people) in December.

  2. Agreed, Mr. Reinhardt. Not only is global warming real but it has been proven to be melting the ice caps at an alarming rate. Stronger and more vicious hurricanes, tornados, cyclones, typhoons are occuring. And the tidal waters are also rising. Global Warming is not a myth, it is very real. Starland has already begun doing its part by outlawing plastic water bottles and requiring all citizens and business owners—>not really any of those, however — to report and reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. We are also implementing a fine for anyone caught littering in Starland. We are a very environmentally consious group of folks and we find this article completely stupid and ignorant.

    • I do not agree. Although some glaciers are receding, others are growing. You’ll notice that the past hurricane seasons have not produced any more Katrina’s (like Al Gore promised). Tidal waters are rising, but who said out of control? Also it cannot be proven that global warming is caused by human activity. I have one answer to that: (Thanks to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster).

      (I deleted Reinhardt’s comment as it offends me very much.)

  3. It may come as a surprise to many, but I do mostly support Parker I’s view, but not to that much of an extent. I’ll be releasing my own statement soon, as I don’t think my views extend as far as Parker’s. I do agree that climate change has been hijacked by many as a ‘convenient cause’, that it has been blown was out of proportion and that humans only contribute a small part to climate change. All will be explained shortly 😉

  4. Okay, just to clarify, this wasn’t written for micronationalism, I just wanted to release it here so I could get my opinion out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: